Cherie Blair brings Culture
Does the headline from this article in the Telegraph, UK, “Cherie Blair brings ‘new culture’ to aspiring businesswomen of India” strike anyone else as unnecessarily patronising? (Terms like ‘white man’s burden’ and ‘bringing the light to the natives’ come to mind quite easily).
Of course, one doesn’t blame the Asian Women of Achievement (AWA) Awards team for the ludicrous headline that the newspaper chose to adopt. Still, I am curious as to what exactly Cherie Blair, a patron for the awards, meant when she says, “I gather, actually, that there are awards [in India], but they are not the same as a Pinky award, because if you have got a Pinky award it’s seriously researched and seriously peer-judged, and you are up against great competition – not somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody else. That’s the culture we want to bring over to Mumbai.”
For starters, there is some serious generalisation and condescension happening there. Yes, some awards in India may not exactly be thoroughly researched, some may involve nepotism, some may even involve money changing hands. But to tar all of them with the same brush and assume that Indian industry has no history of professionally done awards is a case of some big-time looking down the nose (and without one’s glasses too).
And to imply claim that they will bring it to Mumbai; well, I suppose hubris knows no limits. If I seem irked, it is because I am - how terrible to bring in an award that proposes to support women, and then do it in such a patronising manner. This is not an example of women’s solidarity; rather, it is a classic example of the We will teach you what you need to know manner that irks activists in non-Western countries.
Blair’s comment made me very keen to find out what exactly the AWA award process is, so I hopped over to the AWA website, which gives you on the process - exactly nothing. The nomination form (PDF) tells you briefly who is eligible, but about the judging process - zilch. Now, of course, I’m not saying they are not seriously researched and seriously peer-judged , but while looking down their noses at local awards, they might consider actually detailing their own process on the website.
And of course, they could also go look at TiE’s Stree Shakti awards, which do indeed mention how they go about it.
(Also, I seem to have missed linking to this - the 8th Carnival of Feminists is up here, with a lot of stuff specifically on young women and young feminists).
- Related Posts You May Like
- Women, Networking & Entrepreneurship
Reminds me of another set of awards you are aware of na!!! Guess you know what I am talking about
Listen, it is condescending but true…I think MOST awards in India are not awarded on merit…That is not say that ALL awards in the UK and the US are …
Whites will be whites - they will always think they are better than us…
I agree, even though we have problems, we don’t need foreigners to come and lecture us. I mean nepotism is not a thing that they can change in India anyway. Its something that will change gradually, not because of a wise guy lecture. If her saying it was going to actually work, its different.
@ r’s Mom - know what you mean
@Sraboney - everyone knows that some awards are tampered with, but surely not all of them are the same. to say that is to devalue the work being done by many wonderful people and teams…had hesitated before saying ‘whites’ but yes, did feel there was a somewhat racist element to it…
@ Nita-ji - don’t mind someone else pointing out issues, but yeah, not in that supercilious way…it didn’t sound helpful in any way, and as you say, it’s not like she is offering any solutions except promoting her cause…
Yeah, I like her much better when she’s in England and pissing them off rather than us.
Ams - I didn’t know she was doing that there as well…well, you learn something new everyday!
Thanks for the mention.
Did you get a chance to see the final winners?
If not, you can check them on this link:
http://www.tiestreeshakti.org/category/my-stories/