Protecting Hinduism by Attacking Hindu Women
Although not a very outwardly religious person, I am a Hindu and proud to be one. I believe that while Hinduism has had its evils, the best versions of Hinduism promote harmony, righteousness, truthfulness and love of all creation. I love Hinduism for its acceptance of every individual’s right to worship in a manner they choose. The concept of ‘ishta devta’ is unique to us - in a sense, it recognises that Gods are man-made creations, and so long as we are creating them, why not worship a God of your choice, one that you feel close to? I love Hinduism for the way it recognises that the earth does not belong to human beings alone - we revere snakes, we revere trees, our mothers always fed the crows before serving food to anyone, we worship Bhoomi Devi - the earth herself. I love Hinduism for the way it has accomodated dissent - atheism and agnosticism were recognised schools of philosophy in ancient India, there have always been multiple variations on the Ramayana and Mahabharata, some very transgressive.
I don’t think Hinduism is in any danger so long as enough people appreciate its basic tenets, and considering the Indian population, that’s a lot of people. Even if for the majority, religion is all about ritual, still there are enough young people interested in the great myths and stories of ancient India, and their teachings and wisdom.
Yet, a certain set of hooligans feels emboldened enough to assault and harass women, on the pretext of preserving Hindu culture. The recent assault on women in Mangalore, for the “crime” of drinking in a pub, is not shocking for the violence itself - as Smokescreen says, violence against women itself has become commonplace. What shocked me was the blatant justification of the act in the name of ‘guiding’ and ‘protecting’ women against Western culture. Many bloggers have condemned the attack and written on the rise in moral policing across cities in India.
My question is a little different. I don’t inherently have a problem with those who want to reform or promote the Hindu religion. Even if I don’t think that such promotion is necessary and that India has many more pressing problems such as illiteracy, poverty and over-population, those want to focus on religion are entitled to do so. The question is, why does promoting religion automatically deteriorate into the repression and policing of women?
There are many, many things that the promoters of Hindu religion could focus upon. Many ancient Hindu temples, for instance are in a pathetic state. These are temples built by Hindu kings, to glorify Hindu Gods. Young lovers scrawl ‘chunnu loves munnu’ on the walls and garbage is thrown against crumbling walls. But, we are not concerned about the loss of this greatness that has been passed down to us. Hinduism has its own evils to contend with. Even today, in places, Dalits are not allowed to enter temples and their children are ill-treated at school. But, we are not concerned with such reform. Nor are we bothered about folk arts, music and dance which were often patronised by Hindu kings and temples, but are now dying out as the artists find more paying vocations.
All that the self-styled defenders of Hindu culture can think about is whether the hemlines of women’s clothes are long enough and whether or not they are engaging in activities that are ‘alien’ to Hindu culture. Even if we discount the politicians who promote such mobs for political ends, there must be people who join these groups believing that they are furthering the cause of Hinduism. Why does women’s clothing and activity become the target?
For one thing, it is easy to do. Get a bunch of people together, carry some easily available weapons and barge in to the nearest pub or cafe. By contrast, volunteering with Hindu religious and charitable organisations such as the Ramakrishna Math or Chinmaya Mission takes time and effort.
Then, women are easily shamed. In this country, there are always enough people available to point out how women ‘invited’ attack, by their ‘provocative’ dress/speech/activity/whatever. Even those who feel that women should not be assaulted will question as to what ‘decent’ women were doing in a pub. Few women will press cases against a militant outfit, especially one which has political backing.
It is also an extension of the same mindset which evaluates the ‘honour’ of a community by how well it’s women stick to prescribed norms. In this mindset, women are not individuals; they are only representatives of a community, and fragile ones at that, who must be protected from their own actions. If they refuse this protection and cross the lines of prescribed behaviour, they no longer qualify for the tag of ‘virtuous Hindu woman’, the sati-savitri who deserves protection. For men with this mindset, even without extraneous political influences or the lure of money, attacking such women is not a crime. This is also compounded by stereotypes of Muslim men as predatory men who prey on gullible Hindu women. To their minds, it is not feasible that a Hindu woman may ‘choose’ to associate with men of a different religion; she has been duped and must be rescued.
And the sad thing is, this mindset is no longer scarce. While a few actively get out on the streets and assault women, the mindset is more widespread. A few urban individuals condemning such attacks is not enough. And while law and order needs to be strengthened, that is not enough to change this mindset. For a majority of people, the truth is that it is religion and religious leaders who have the most influence. Hindu religious leaders need to take a more aggressive lead in showing the way for Hinduism - for guiding people on to a progressive and inclusive version of Hinduism. In the absence of leaders such as Swami Vivekananda, who were both Hindu and forward-thinking, the space for Hindu leadership is being hijacked by narrow-minded zealots for their own ends, and the results are there for all to see.
- Related Posts You May Like
- Violence and Templatising Women
- Women as Population Agents
- Widening the Prism
Extremely well said.
The fact that every community has strict rules and regulations which women have to follow is what is most deplorable, while all the men go scot free!
Through history, women have been seen as the inner part of any community, be it the Hindus, Muslims, Christians or Jews. Now as women venture out, it just doesn’t settle down with the men folk. I wonder whether it will ever!
Will moving to any forward city make any difference, I am guessing these religious extremists will land up anywhere in due course of time.
Will doing as they please stop it, maybe with time, they would want us to follow purdah next!
Where shall all this end? Why not leave it at no religion mixing with politics? What happened to a secular state?
Yes. I think part of it is that these men are just unable to digest that modern women are free agents. Infact, on a yahoo groups discussion, I saw many people supporting this act, with one man saying, “if your sister had been there, you would have done the same thing”. The idea that his sister is an independent person, and not his possession to be watched over, seemed to elude him. Religions of course have always promoted this line of thinking - it is upto us to discard their outmoded teachings. As for India being a secular state, secularism is mostly only for vote-bank purposes, no party really believes in it.
One of the most articulate, passionate and well-thought out pieces I’ve read in a long time. Brilliant!
This was just another incident in the long list of continuing shameful targeting of women in India. A few years back, we had Imam’s objecting to Sania Mirza’s skirts or some other actress’s dress somewhere. Defending culture against real and imagined threats is one thing, but in this case, it is a political issue. If some of these culture police were transferred over to the anti-terrorist squads, that would suit everyone well.
Women issues are used for doing publicity stunts?. The media is splashing the leaders all over. Was that the idea?
If these people have so much energyt, time, and money power, they might as well use it for causes like slum development, education for poor children, health care . That is more productive .
But will they? they only want neta crown?
a - Thank you, though I wish I didn’t have to write it
S - yes, unfortunately, people equate culture with clothing. This is one thing where both Muslim and Hindu fundamentalists have the same mindset. The truth is that most of these hooligans wouldn’t know how to spell culture in any language. It is all a mindset of ‘good women should stay indoors and behave like how we tell them to’.
Jayalakshmi - not just women’s issues, any such issues can be used as publicity stunts. For instance, the repeated targeting of young couples at public places for the ‘crime’ of displaying affection. And yes, why would they invest in genuine causes when you can make money and get recognised with very little effort?
Apu,
I agree with you. I am sure that the men who went about assaulting those poor girls in Mangalore would not know the names of the five Vedas, or the difference between Dwaita and Adwaita. I doubt any of them ever took the time to read the Gita, but hey, that shouldn’t stop them from being ‘good Hindus’, should it now?
I am always puzzled about the fact that the most militant Hindus I am personally acqainted with are the ones with the least knowledge of Hindu philosophy and thought. I know a lot of people who call themselves ‘kattar’ Hindus, but who have never read the Gita, or the other holy Hindu texts. Do you have any explanation for this? Honestly I am mystified by it. If you are so passionate about Hinduism, wouldn’t you take the trouble to actually read and understand its texts?
‘It is also an extension of the same mindset which evaluates the ‘honour’ of a community by how well it’s women stick to prescribed norms’.
The sad part is that there are no norms for men.He can rape his unsuspecting niece barely 15 years of age and the girl’s mother and grandmother would hush up the matter. A father in law can pounce on his daughter in law and the girl becomes her husband’s mother.Well the list is long and will remain so unless women learn to stand up for each other.
Apu, Very well written.
I want to repeat what Peeti wrote: ” I am sure that the men who went about assaulting those poor girls in Mangalore would not know the names of the five Vedas, or the difference between Dwaita and Adwaita. I doubt any of them ever took the time to read the Gita, but hey, that shouldn’t stop them from being ‘good Hindus’, should it now?”
We already have a problem of young Hindus shying away from Hinduism thinking it is very complex and some what dogmatic.
These kind of acts from fanatics who have nothing to do with Hinduism will only make matters worse. Little they know the fact that the most important aspect of Hinduism is FREEDOM OF THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS.
Even an atheist has the ABSOLUTE RIGHT to condemn Hinduism in the public and still proudly proclaim he or she is a Hindu.
Voltaire in Essay on Tolerance wrote: “I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death, your right to say it.”
Hinduism is the symbolic representation of what Voltaire wrote. So sad that fanatics do not understand that fact.